Accessibility Report for: piznet
You are viewing a shared accessibility report.
Accessibility Report for: piznet
Test Information
- Website Name: piznet
- Scope: https://piznet.de/ https://piznet.de/ueber/ https://piznet.de/netzwerk/ https://piznet.de/news/
- WCAG Version: WCAG 2.2
- Conformance Target: Level AA
- Created: 4/17/2025, 12:28:42 PM
- Updated: 5/21/2025, 2:44:24 PM
Summary
Overall Results Distribution
Distribution of all test results: Passed 36, Failed 12
- Passed: 36
- Failed: 12
Summary
Category | Count |
---|---|
Passed | 36 |
Failed | 12 |
Re-test | 0 |
Not tested | 0 |
Total | 48 |
- 7 criteria were marked as not applicable and are excluded from the evaluation.
General Information:
The test procedure is based on the guidelines of the WCAG 2.2 standard to ensure a structured
and standardized evaluation of accessibility. Only the test steps that are relevant for the
respective page are taken into account.
The test steps are evaluated according to a
five-stage scheme that presents the results in a differentiated manner:
Passed: | The requirements are met in full. |
Failed: | The requirements are not met. |
Not tested: | No result available so far. |
Re-test: | This requirement is scheduled for a re-test. |
Not in scope: | Not in scope of this test - is not taken into account in the evaluation. |
Not applicable: | Excluded from the test because the test step is not relevant for the tested page - is not taken into account in the evaluation. |
This procedure enables a precise and comprehensible assessment of accessibility and ensures that the results are tailored to the specific requirements of the tested content.
Test Evaluation:
Executive Summary
This accessibility evaluation has revealed several critical issues that significantly impact the user experience for individuals with disabilities. Key findings indicate a lack of proper semantic structure, inadequate text alternatives for non-text content, and insufficient keyboard navigation support. These barriers can hinder users from effectively interacting with the content, leading to frustration and exclusion.
Key Strengths
The site demonstrates a clear layout that aids in navigation for users without disabilities.
Critical Issues
Missing text alternatives for images and other non-text content, which prevents visually impaired users from understanding the content.
Inadequate keyboard accessibility, making it difficult for users who rely on keyboard navigation to interact with the site.
Improper use of heading elements, which disrupts the logical flow of content and affects screen reader navigation.
Recommendations
Implement text alternatives for all non-text content to ensure that all users can access the information presented.
Enhance keyboard navigation by ensuring all interactive elements are accessible via keyboard and providing visible focus indicators.
Review and correct the use of heading elements to create a logical content structure that aids in navigation for assistive technology users.
Conduct user testing with individuals with disabilities to gather feedback and identify additional areas for improvement.
Overall Compliance Statement
Based on the qualitative findings of this evaluation, the site currently does not meet the standards for accessibility as outlined in WCAG. Significant improvements are necessary to create an inclusive experience for all users.
Details: Principles List
Details for Perceivability
Information and GUI components must be presented in such a way that they are perceptible to the user.
General information
The perceptibility test area includes testing the accessibility of visual and sensory content, particularly in relation to the principles of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). The aim is to ensure that content is perceptible for all users.
- Passed: 12
- Failed: 7
Perceivability
Distribution of test results
- Passed: 12
- Failed: 7
Observation
Category | Count |
---|---|
Passed | 12 |
Failed | 7 |
Re-test | 0 |
Not tested | 0 |
Total | 19 |
- 1 criterion was marked as not applicable and is excluded from the evaluation.
Evaluation:
Principle WCAG2:perceivable (Perceivable) Summary
The Perceivable principle of WCAG2 emphasizes the importance of making content available to all users in ways that they can perceive. This principle is crucial as it ensures that information is presented in formats that can be accessed by individuals with varying abilities, including those with visual, auditory, or cognitive disabilities. Accessibility issues under this principle can significantly hinder users' ability to understand and interact with content, leading to exclusion and frustration.
Key Findings
Many images lack appropriate alternative text, which prevents users who rely on screen readers from understanding the content and context of visual elements.
Audio and video content often lacks captions or transcripts, making it inaccessible to users who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Some content is not structured correctly, with headings used inconsistently, which can confuse users navigating with assistive technologies.
Color contrast ratios do not meet recommended standards, making it difficult for users with visual impairments to read text and discern important information.
Text resizing options are limited, which can hinder users with low vision from accessing content comfortably.
Recommendations
Ensure all images have descriptive alternative text that conveys the purpose and content of the image.
Provide captions and transcripts for all audio and video content to enhance accessibility for users who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Implement a consistent heading structure throughout the content to facilitate easier navigation for users relying on screen readers.
Review and adjust color contrast ratios to ensure compliance with accessibility standards, enhancing readability for users with visual impairments.
Enable text resizing options and ensure that content remains accessible and readable at various sizes.
Impact on Users
Accessibility issues related to the Perceivable principle can have a profound impact on users with disabilities. For individuals who are blind or have low vision, the lack of alternative text and poor color contrast can lead to a complete inability to access visual content. Users who are deaf or hard of hearing may miss critical information if audio and video content is not properly captioned. Additionally, inconsistent heading structures can create confusion for users relying on assistive technologies, making navigation difficult and frustrating. Overall, these barriers can prevent users from fully engaging with content, ultimately leading to exclusion and a negative user experience.
Details for Operability
GUI components and navigation must be operable.
General information
The usability test area includes checking whether content and functions are accessible regardless of motor or sensory impairments. The focus here is on keyboard operability, visible focus indicators and the avoidance of barriers in interactive elements.
- Passed: 15
- Failed: 4
Operability
Distribution of test results
- Passed: 15
- Failed: 4
Observation
Category | Count |
---|---|
Passed | 15 |
Failed | 4 |
Re-test | 0 |
Not tested | 0 |
Total | 19 |
- 1 criterion was marked as not applicable and is excluded from the evaluation.
Evaluation:
Principle WCAG2:operable (Operable) Summary
This principle emphasizes the importance of ensuring that all users can interact with web content effectively. An operable interface allows users to navigate, access, and utilize functionalities without hindrance. Accessibility barriers in this area can significantly impact users, particularly those with disabilities, as they may face challenges in using a mouse or other pointing devices.
Key Findings
Keyboard navigation is not fully supported, making it difficult for users who rely on keyboard input to access all interactive elements.
Some headings are improperly structured, which can confuse users relying on screen readers to navigate content efficiently.
Interactive components lack clear focus indicators, hindering users' ability to discern which element is currently selected or active.
Recommendations
Ensure all interactive elements are accessible via keyboard navigation, including form fields, buttons, and links.
Review and correct the heading structure to follow a logical hierarchy, enhancing navigation for screen reader users.
Add visible focus indicators to all interactive components to improve usability for keyboard users.
Impact on Users
Accessibility issues related to the operability principle can severely affect users with disabilities, such as those who are blind or have motor impairments. Users who rely on keyboard navigation may find it impossible to interact with critical features, leading to frustration and exclusion. Additionally, users with cognitive disabilities may struggle to understand content that is not well-structured, further complicating their ability to engage with the website effectively.
Details for Understandability
Information and the operation of the user interface must be understandable.
General information
The comprehensibility test area includes checking whether content and functions are clearly structured, easy to understand and user-friendly. Particular emphasis is placed on simple language, consistent navigation and clear error messages.
- Passed: 9
Understandability
Distribution of test results
- Passed: 9
Observation
Category | Count |
---|---|
Passed | 9 |
Failed | 0 |
Re-test | 0 |
Not tested | 0 |
Total | 9 |
- 4 criteria were marked as not applicable and are excluded from the evaluation.
Evaluation:
Principle WCAG2:understandable (Understandable) Summary
This principle emphasizes the importance of making content comprehensible and predictable for all users. An understandable interface allows users to easily navigate, interact with, and comprehend the information presented. When content is clear and straightforward, it enhances user experience and reduces cognitive load, particularly for individuals with disabilities or those who may not be familiar with the subject matter.
Key Findings
Content often uses complex language and jargon that may not be easily understood by all users, particularly those with cognitive disabilities.
Instructions and error messages are sometimes vague or unclear, leading to confusion during form submissions or interactions.
Consistent navigation and layout are generally maintained, which aids in predictability and user orientation.
Some content lacks adequate headings and structure, making it difficult for users to skim and find relevant information quickly.
Recommendations
Simplify language throughout the website, avoiding jargon and using plain language to enhance comprehension.
Provide clear, concise instructions and error messages that guide users on how to correct mistakes or navigate tasks effectively.
Implement a consistent layout and navigation structure across all pages to improve predictability and ease of use.
Utilize headings and subheadings effectively to create a clear content hierarchy, allowing users to scan and locate information quickly.
Impact on Users
Issues related to the understandability of content can significantly hinder users with cognitive disabilities, as well as those who may have limited literacy skills or are non-native speakers. These users may struggle to comprehend instructions, navigate the site effectively, or complete tasks, leading to frustration and potential abandonment of the site. By addressing these issues, the overall accessibility and usability of the content can be greatly improved, fostering an inclusive environment for all users.
Details for Robustness
The content must be robust enough to be interpreted by a variety of user agents, including assistive technologies.
General information
The robustness test area ensures that digital content works reliably on a variety of devices, browsers and assistive technologies. The focus is on compatibility with standard technologies and support for future updates.
- Failed: 1
Robustness
Distribution of test results
- Failed: 1
Observation
Category | Count |
---|---|
Passed | 0 |
Failed | 1 |
Re-test | 0 |
Not tested | 0 |
Total | 1 |
- 1 criterion was marked as not applicable and is excluded from the evaluation.
Evaluation:
Principle WCAG2:robust (Robust) Summary
The Robust principle emphasizes the importance of ensuring that content is compatible with current and future user agents, including assistive technologies. This principle is crucial as it guarantees that users can reliably access and interact with web content, regardless of the tools they use. A robust web experience fosters inclusivity, allowing all users, particularly those with disabilities, to engage with digital content effectively.
Key Findings
Many elements lacked proper semantic markup, which can hinder assistive technologies from interpreting content correctly.
Inconsistent use of ARIA roles and attributes was observed, leading to confusion for users relying on screen readers.
Some interactive components did not have keyboard accessibility, limiting engagement for users who cannot use a mouse.
HTML validation issues were present, which can affect the rendering of content across different browsers and devices.
Recommendations
Ensure that all HTML elements are used semantically to enhance compatibility with assistive technologies.
Implement consistent and correct use of ARIA roles and attributes to improve the accessibility of dynamic content.
Enhance keyboard navigation for all interactive elements to ensure accessibility for users who rely on keyboard input.
Conduct regular HTML validation checks to identify and rectify any markup issues that could affect content rendering.
Impact on Users
Issues related to the Robust principle can significantly impact users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on assistive technologies such as screen readers or alternative input devices. Inadequate semantic structure and improper use of ARIA can lead to misinterpretation of content, making it difficult for these users to navigate and understand web pages. Additionally, lack of keyboard accessibility can exclude users with mobility impairments from engaging with interactive elements, further isolating them from the digital experience. Ensuring compliance with this principle is essential for creating an inclusive online environment for all users.
Details: Criterion List
The detailed results are partly generated automatically on the basis of the international WCAG - the language is therefore English.
Criteria Details for Perceivability
URL Aliases:
- A: https://piznet.de/
- B: https://piznet.de/ueber/
- C: https://piznet.de/netzwerk/
- D: https://piznet.de/news/
Success Criterion | Level | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1.1 Non-text Content | A | Passed | Passed | Failed | Failed |
C: Observation SummaryThe primary accessibility issue identified through manual testing (MAIT) is the lack of a meaningful text alternative for a significant image. This violates WCAG 1.1.1 (Non-text Content), which requires that all meaningful images have a text alternative that serves an equivalent purpose. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThis issue significantly affects users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to interpret web content. Without a meaningful text alternative, these users cannot understand the purpose or content of the image, leading to a loss of information and context. This can hinder their ability to navigate and comprehend the webpage effectively. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from manual testing (MAIT) are related to images not being properly coded as either meaningful or decorative. Specifically, images are missing appropriate Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate web content. Without appropriate Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) | A | Failed | n/a | n/a | Passed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) is the lack of captions for pre-recorded multimedia content. This is a serious violation of WCAG 1.2.2, which requires that all pre-recorded multimedia content must have captions to ensure accessibility for users with hearing impairments. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThe absence of captions in pre-recorded multimedia content significantly impacts users with hearing impairments, making it difficult or impossible for them to understand the audio content. This can lead to exclusion from important information, entertainment, or educational content, thereby reducing their overall user experience and access to information. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) | A | Failed | n/a | n/a | n/a |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue found from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) is the lack of audio descriptions in pre-recorded videos with audio. This violates WCAG 1.2.3 (Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)). The context of sounds is not clear, making the content inaccessible to users who rely on audio descriptions. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThis issue significantly affects users with visual impairments who rely on audio descriptions to understand the visual content of a video. Without audio descriptions, these users miss out on important information conveyed through visuals, which can lead to a lack of comprehension and engagement with the content. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.2.4 Captions (Live) | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) | AA | Failed | n/a | n/a | n/a |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) is the lack of audio descriptions in pre-recorded videos with audio. This is a serious violation of WCAG 1.2.5 (Audio Description (Prerecorded)), as it prevents users with visual impairments from understanding the context of sounds in the video. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThe absence of audio descriptions significantly impacts users with visual impairments. These users rely on audio descriptions to understand visual content and context that is not conveyed through the video's audio track alone. Without audio descriptions, they miss out on important information, making the content inaccessible and excluding them from fully experiencing the video. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.3.1 Info and Relationships | A | Failed | Passed | Passed | Failed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified include elements coded as headings that do not function as headings, text that visually appears as a heading but is not coded as such, and mismatched programmatic and visual heading levels. These issues were found through both automated and manual testing. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues can significantly affect users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen readers. Incorrect heading structure can make it difficult for users to navigate the content efficiently, leading to confusion and a poor user experience. Users with cognitive disabilities may also struggle to understand the content hierarchy. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe primary accessibility issue identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) is that the programmatic level of headings does not match the level presented visually. This inconsistency can cause confusion for users who rely on assistive technologies to navigate the content. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesUsers with visual impairments who rely on screen readers and other assistive technologies may find it difficult to understand the structure and hierarchy of the content if the heading levels are not correctly implemented. This can lead to confusion and make it harder for users to navigate the page efficiently. Users with cognitive disabilities may also struggle with understanding the content structure when heading levels are inconsistent. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.3.4 Orientation | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.1 Use of Color | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.2 Audio Control | A | Passed | Passed | n/a | n/a |
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) | AA | Failed | Failed | Failed | Failed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient color contrast between foreground and background elements. These violations fail to meet the WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds, which impacts the readability and usability of the content for users with visual impairments. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues primarily affect users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. Insufficient color contrast can make text difficult to read, leading to a poor user experience and potentially causing users to miss important information. Ensuring adequate contrast is crucial for readability and accessibility. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient color contrast. Specifically, the foreground and background colors do not meet the WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds. This includes text elements and links with insufficient contrast ratios, which are critical for readability and accessibility. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. Insufficient color contrast makes it difficult for these users to read text and interact with links, leading to a poor user experience and potential exclusion from accessing important information. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
B: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient color contrast between foreground and background colors. Specifically, the contrast ratio does not meet the WCAG 2 AA minimum threshold of 4.5:1. This issue affects several anchor elements on the page, which currently have a contrast ratio of 1.92:1. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. Insufficient color contrast makes it difficult for these users to read the text, which can hinder their ability to navigate the website effectively. This can lead to a poor user experience and may prevent users from accessing important information or completing tasks on the site. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
C: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient color contrast. Specifically, the foreground and background colors of anchor elements do not meet the WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio threshold of 4.5:1. This issue was found in multiple anchor elements on the page. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues primarily affect users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. Insufficient color contrast can make text difficult to read, leading to poor user experience and potentially causing users to miss important information or links. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient color contrast between the foreground text and background colors. Specifically, the contrast ratio of 1.92:1 does not meet the WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio threshold of 4.5:1. This issue affects multiple anchor elements on the page. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesInsufficient color contrast can significantly impact users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. These users may have difficulty reading text that does not stand out sufficiently from the background, leading to a poor user experience and potential accessibility barriers. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.4.4 Resize Text | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.5 Images of Text | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.10 Reflow | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.11 Non-text Contrast | AA | Failed | Failed | Failed | Failed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue identified from manual testing (MAIT) is the insufficient contrast of visual information used to identify active user interface components and their states. This issue is serious as it affects the usability of the interface for users with visual impairments. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesUsers with visual impairments, including those with low vision or color blindness, may have difficulty distinguishing active user interface components and their states due to insufficient contrast. This can lead to confusion and difficulty in navigating the website, reducing overall accessibility and user experience. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
B: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient contrast in visual information used to identify active user interface components and their states. This includes links that do not have sufficient contrast between their text and background colors, making it difficult for users to distinguish them, especially when they are in different states (e.g., hover, focus). Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with visual impairments, including those with low vision or color blindness. Insufficient contrast can make it challenging for these users to identify interactive elements and understand their states, leading to difficulties in navigation and interaction with the website. This can result in a poor user experience and hindered accessibility. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
C: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to insufficient contrast for visual information used to identify active user interface components and their states. This affects the links for "Kontakt," "Impressum," and "Datenschutz" on the website, making it difficult for users with visual impairments to identify these interactive elements. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with visual impairments, including those with low vision and color blindness. Insufficient contrast makes it difficult for these users to distinguish active interface components, which can hinder navigation and interaction with the website. This can lead to frustration and an inability to access important information or perform necessary actions. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified involve insufficient contrast for visual information used to identify active user interface components and their states. This issue was found in multiple anchor elements, making it difficult for users with visual impairments to distinguish these elements. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesInsufficient contrast affects users with visual impairments, including those with low vision or color blindness. These users may struggle to identify active links or buttons, making it difficult for them to navigate the website effectively. This can lead to a poor user experience and hinder their ability to access important information. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
1.4.12 Text Spacing | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
Criteria Details for Operability
URL Aliases:
- A: https://piznet.de/
- B: https://piznet.de/ueber/
- C: https://piznet.de/netzwerk/
- D: https://piznet.de/news/
Success Criterion | Level | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1.1 Keyboard | A | Failed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.2.1 Timing Adjustable | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.4.1 Bypass Blocks | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.4.2 Page Titled | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.4.3 Focus Order | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) | A | Failed | Failed | Failed | Failed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) include the following: 1) Links without discernible text, and 2) Links whose purpose is not clear from the link text alone or from the context. These issues affect the ability of screen readers to convey meaningful information about the links to users. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate web content. Without discernible text, screen readers cannot provide users with information about the link's destination, making it difficult for them to understand the purpose of the link. This can lead to confusion and a poor user experience, as users may not be able to navigate the website effectively. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
B: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) is that the purpose of the links is not clearly described by their link text alone or by the link text together with the preceding page context. This violates WCAG 2.4.4 (Link Purpose (In Context)). Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen readers. Users with visual impairments or cognitive disabilities may find it difficult to understand the purpose of the links if the context is not clear. This can lead to confusion and difficulty in navigating the website effectively. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
C: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are primarily related to links lacking discernible text and link text not clearly describing the purpose of the link. These issues are critical as they prevent screen readers from conveying the link's purpose to users, making navigation and understanding of the content difficult. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate the web. Without discernible text, screen readers cannot provide meaningful information about the links, leading to confusion and difficulty in navigation. Users with cognitive disabilities may also struggle to understand the purpose of the links if they are not clearly described. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues found from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) include links without discernible text and links whose purpose is not clear from the link text alone or the surrounding context. These issues are serious and impact the usability of the website for users relying on screen readers. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate the web. Links without discernible text or unclear link purposes make it difficult for these users to understand the content and navigate the website effectively. This can lead to confusion, frustration, and an inability to access important information. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
2.4.5 Multiple Ways | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.4.6 Headings and Labels | AA | Failed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified include: 1) An element coded as a heading must function as a heading, and 2) Text that looks like a heading must be coded as a heading. These issues were found through both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT). Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues can significantly impact users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen readers. Screen readers use headings to navigate and understand the structure of the content. If elements are incorrectly coded as headings or if text that appears to be a heading is not coded as such, it can cause confusion and make navigation difficult for users with visual impairments or cognitive disabilities. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
2.4.7 Focus Visible | AA | Failed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issue identified is that components, specifically within a map interface, do not provide a visible indication when they have input focus. This issue was found through both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT). Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThis issue significantly affects users with visual impairments, including those who rely on keyboard navigation. Without a visible focus indicator, these users may not be able to determine which element is currently focused, making it difficult to navigate and interact with the map interface effectively. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.5.1 Pointer Gestures | A | n/a | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation | A | n/a | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.5.3 Label in Name | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
2.5.4 Motion Actuation | A | n/a | Passed | n/a | n/a |
2.5.7 Dragging Movements | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
Criteria Details for Understandability
URL Aliases:
- A: https://piznet.de/
- B: https://piznet.de/ueber/
- C: https://piznet.de/netzwerk/
- D: https://piznet.de/news/
Success Criterion | Level | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1.1 Language of Page | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
3.1.2 Language of Parts | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
3.2.1 On Focus | A | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
3.2.2 On Input | A | n/a | n/a | Passed | n/a |
3.2.3 Consistent Navigation | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
3.2.4 Consistent Identification | AA | Passed | Passed | Passed | Passed |
3.2.6 Consistent Help | A | Passed | Passed | n/a | Passed |
3.3.1 Error Identification | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
3.3.2 Labels or Instructions | A | Passed | n/a | Passed | Passed |
3.3.3 Error Suggestion | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
3.3.7 Redundant Entry | A | Passed | n/a | Passed | Passed |
3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum) | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Criteria Details for Robustness
URL Aliases:
- A: https://piznet.de/
- B: https://piznet.de/ueber/
- C: https://piznet.de/netzwerk/
- D: https://piznet.de/news/
Success Criterion | Level | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value | A | Failed | Failed | Failed | Failed |
A: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) include links without discernible text and anchor elements functioning as custom widgets without the appropriate ARIA widget roles. These issues violate WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) guidelines. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly impact users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen readers. Links without discernible text cannot be understood or navigated by screen reader users, making it difficult for them to access content. Additionally, anchor elements functioning as custom widgets without appropriate ARIA roles can confuse users who depend on assistive technologies, as the role and functionality of these elements are not properly conveyed. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
B: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified include the use of unsupported ARIA attributes and the improper use of anchor elements as custom widgets without the appropriate ARIA roles. These issues were found both through automated testing and manual inspection. Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues can significantly impact users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on assistive technologies such as screen readers. Unsupported ARIA attributes can cause confusion or misinterpretation of the element's purpose, while anchor elements functioning as custom widgets without proper roles can lead to navigation difficulties and a lack of clarity regarding the element's functionality. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
C: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to links that lack discernible text. This means that the anchor elements ( Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate web content. Without discernible text, screen readers cannot convey the purpose of the links, leading to confusion and a poor user experience. This can also affect users with cognitive disabilities who may rely on clear and descriptive link text to understand the context and destination of the links. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
D: Observation SummaryThe key accessibility issues identified from both automated testing (Baat) and manual testing (MAIT) are related to links that lack discernible text. Specifically, there are multiple instances where anchor elements do not have text that is visible to screen readers, which violates WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value). Impact on Users with DisabilitiesThese issues significantly affect users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen readers. Without discernible text, screen readers cannot convey the purpose of the links to users, making navigation and content comprehension difficult. This impacts users with visual impairments, cognitive disabilities, and those who use assistive technologies. Recommendations for Fixing the Issues
| |||||
4.1.3 Status Messages | AA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |